Written by
Sarah Nguyen
Published on
Sep 12, 2025
Share
Why an API became inevitable
For most of the platform’s life, interaction happened only through the interface. That was enough at first. But as teams grew, their requests became louder and more complex. They wanted automation: creating projects automatically, syncing metrics into dashboards, or connecting workflows across tools. Without an API, every request ended with the same limitation—manual effort.
The shift came when we realized that not offering an API meant forcing teams into our way of working. A developer put it simply during a feedback session:
“We don’t want to work around your platform. We want your platform to work inside our world.”
That perspective reframed the challenge. We didn’t need to add more features—we needed to make the features accessible programmatically. That’s how the first version of our API was born.
A simple example
At launch, the API supported creating projects, updating them, and retrieving performance data. To make it approachable, we kept the syntax familiar and the structure clean. Here’s a TypeScript snippet showing how to create a project:
This example may look basic, but it demonstrates the intent: with just a few lines of code, repetitive tasks become automated. Marketing teams can spin up new projects for each campaign. Developers can trigger project creation from CI pipelines. Analysts can pull performance data into existing BI tools without manual exports. The power comes not from complexity, but from accessibility.
Early feedback and unexpected uses
When we quietly released the API to a handful of early adopters, their creativity went further than we expected. Agencies used it to onboard new clients automatically. Startups built scripts that synced platform data with Airtable or Google Sheets. One team even connected it to an internal alerting system that pinged Slack whenever project performance dropped.
The variety of use cases reminded us why APIs matter. No central product team can predict every integration a customer might want. By exposing endpoints like /projects
, /metrics
, or /users
, we stopped trying to anticipate every need and started enabling teams to solve problems their way.
For clarity, here’s how we compared “before API” and “after API” in internal reviews:
Scenario | Before API | After API |
---|---|---|
New project | Manual input | Automated call |
Data sync | CSV export | Direct fetch |
Alerts | Not possible | Slack trigger |
The table isn’t just a list of tasks—it shows how friction dissolved. What once required multiple manual steps now happens invisibly in the background.
What’s next
The first version is intentionally focused, but the roadmap is broader. We plan to add endpoints for analytics queries, team management, and notification hooks. Security remains a priority, so all calls require proper Authorization
headers and use HTTPS
exclusively. We’re also exploring OAuth for multi-user setups, making it easier for organizations to manage access at scale.
The philosophy is clear: the API isn’t an add-on, it’s infrastructure. It transforms the platform from a closed product into a flexible foundation. And like any foundation, its value isn’t in what it does alone, but in what others build on top of it.
By giving teams the ability to shape their workflows directly, we stop being the bottleneck. Instead, we become the enabler. That shift—away from control and toward empowerment—is what makes this release feel less like a feature and more like a turning point.
Get this template!